Skip to content
Active incident? Certified responders answer 24/7, no retainer required.  Experienced a breach? →
Talk to an Expert
Search icon
Talk to an Expert
from code to cloud

The Confidence Standard · Insight Pillar

Ready for the audit,

with evidence to prove it.

Framework-mapped gap assessment and audit-ready evidence.

Most compliance programs have the controls in place and still fail the audit, because
nobody mapped the evidence to the specific framework an auditor will actually test against.
This assessment benchmarks your environment against the named standard you need to pass
(HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR or CMMC), scores every control, and hands
you a gap list written in the exact language an auditor will accept.
 
 
 
Talk to an expert
Download the datasheet

Professional Service, expert-led, project-based work. Deep expertise, delivered with structure.

where this sits

Part of the Cybersecurity portfolio, Insight pillar.

This service serves the CISO KPI: Risk Awareness.

PILLAR 01

INSIGHT

Compliance readiness maps controls to evidence an auditor will actually check.

PILLAR 02

PREVENTION

Closed gaps become the configuration and policy work Cyber Implementation and Policy & Process Development carry out.

PILLAR 03

RESILIENCE

A vCISO engagement keeps the evidence current between audit cycles.

Not the same as Skyrocket Cyber Maturity. That benchmarks your whole program against NIST CSF. This is narrower and deeper: scored against the one named framework your next audit will test.
engagement tiers

Sized to how many frameworks apply to you.

Most clients need one or two frameworks scored well, not six scored shallow.

SINGLE FRAMEWORK

One Standard, Fully Mapped

Gap assessment against one named framework, control-by-control, with an evidence map and a prioritized remediation list.

Scope this tier →

MULTI-FRAMEWORK

Overlapping Standards

Two or more frameworks assessed together, with shared controls mapped once so the same evidence satisfies both auditors.

Scope this tier →

CONTINUOUS

Always Audit-Ready

Quarterly re-scoring so evidence stays current between audit cycles, instead of a scramble in the weeks before one.

Scope this tier →

what it covers

What audit-ready means for us.

Framework-mapped gap assessment

Every control scored against the named standard's own language, not a generic checklist adapted after the fact.

Evidence an auditor will accept

Documentation tied to the specific control it satisfies, so it holds up when an auditor asks where the evidence lives.

A remediation roadmap, ranked by audit risk

Gaps ranked by audit risk and effort, so the team knows what to close first with the time available before the audit date.

Built to be re-run

The same scoring method every cycle, so year-over-year progress is a comparison, not a fresh guess.

honest qualification

When this is the right move, and when it's not.

Start here if...

  • You have an audit or certification date on the calendar and need to know where you actually stand.
  • Your controls exist, but nobody has mapped them to the evidence an auditor will ask for.
  • You need HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR or CMMC readiness specifically, not a general risk score.
  • You are renewing cyber insurance and the underwriter wants documented compliance posture.

Something else first if...

where this connects

This rarely stands alone

REFERENCED BY

API Security Assessment

API findings feed directly into evidence for ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and others.

See API Security Assessment  →

CLOSES THE GAPS

Cybersecurity Solution Implementation

Turns compliance gaps into deployed, configured controls.

See Implementation →

ONGOING OWNERSHIP

vCISO Services

Keeps evidence current and owns the relationship with your auditor between cycles.

See vCISO →

Questions we get asked

Straight answers before the call.

How is this different from the Skyrocket Cyber Maturity Assessment?

Skyrocket benchmarks your whole security program against NIST CSF, broadly. This is narrower and deeper: scored against one named compliance framework, control-by-control, in the exact language an auditor for that framework will use. Many clients run Skyrocket first to see the whole picture, then Compliance Readiness for the specific audit ahead of them.

Can you cover more than one framework in the same engagement?

Yes. The Multi-Framework tier scores overlapping standards together and maps shared controls once, so the same evidence satisfies more than one auditor instead of being collected twice.

 

Do you help fix the gaps, or just find them?

This engagement finds and ranks the gaps. Closing them is handled by Cybersecurity Solution Implementation for configuration work or Policy & Process Development for documentation, both scoped separately against the specific findings here.

 

How is this priced?

Fixed price by framework count and environment scope, established on the discovery call, so the number doesn't move if the work takes longer than expected.

Know exactly where the gap is

before the auditor finds it

Get in touch to scope which frameworks apply and what a scored gap list would actually show.

Talk to an expert